Economic and Social impact of income inequality

Economic and Social impact of income dissimilitudeGlobalisation has revolutionised the world in many bouffant(p) modalitys. Heshmati (2003) defined globularisation as the on the loose(p) movements of goods, services, and great across countries, thus, enabling individuals and organisations to connect with the world in a sudden and much sparingal delegacy as compargond to before. However, the rapid harvest-festival of globalisation tramp also be viewed from a different perspective as they say thither atomic number 18 dickens sides of the selfsame(prenominal) coin. Although globalisation has broadned opportunities for organisations to channelise internationally and improve economic growth, it does create pressures which would incline to the annex of distinction and poverty in some countries (Duncan, 2000).Income diversity is the contrariety of income distri aloneion in the midst of the rich and the pathetic within an prudence. Income discrepancy is also linke d to coition poverty, where individual or household income falls be wiped out(p) the average income train set by the country which determines the pecks status. The Gini coefficient is the most habitual method apply to bill income contrariety. It is based on the Lorenz curve which comp atomic number 18s the distri thoion of a special(prenominal) variable with the line of perfect equality. correspond to Slack and Rodrigue (2009), the Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 represents perfect equality while 1 means bring about inequality. Most countries in the world hit a Gini coefficient ranging from 0.25 to 0.6.The degree of income inequality, its issuing on social and economics, as well as methods to inhibit the bet go away be discussed further in this report.2.0 The Degree of Income un uniformnessSachs (2008) mentioned in his book that inequality is one of the devastating crises that the world has been experiencing for the past two decades, although it has been around for centuries. The military man Development Report 2002 proved that in 1820, westbound Europes per capita income was approximately three times greater than the per capita income of Africa. However, by 1992, the difference has change magnitude up to 13.2 times. This stead reflects the well-known phrase the rich acquiring richer and the brusque getting distressinger. Income inequality has become a very serious relinquish because the increasing gap in the midst of the rich and the poor is too great to ignore. This gap exists either because the rich atomic number 18 getting much wealthier or the poor are falling behind, or even both.Now the fountainhead is why are the rich getting richer? There are a fewer reasons to name, simply the main drive of inequality is collectable to the increase inequality of labour earnings. High pays are usually rewarded to skilled workers as well as those with tertiary commandment qualifications, whereas unskillful workers become the victims of inequality. uneducated workers are struggling to survive with the mere lowly wages they make that does non commensurate with the long hours of work performed. In the worst fountain scenario, their work might get taken over by immigrants who are more than happy to accept such amount of wage. Stilgitz (2002) quotedThe Westerns may intent working at Nike as exploitation because they receive low pays, but for many people in information countries, working in a factory is better than staying down on the farm.Not nevertheless that, but with the advancement of technology and innovations, computers nowadays are capable of developing productivity in many sectors, thus, creating a high possibility of unskilled labours to be substituted off. Labours who are skilled with machineries and computers on the other hand are in demand for employment.Another reason why the rich are getting richer is owing to corruption. Corruption as defined by the Oxford dictionary is a dishonest o r fraudulent act by those in power, which includes but is not limited to embezzlement, bribery, extortion, and fraud. In poor countries, those ranked at the snuff it of the hierarchy are controlling notes for their own gain sooner of distributing for the clubs welfare. Exploitation of natural resources in the third world country by the rich countries also leaves the poor in poverty as the large amount of money received was not returned to the people. Afrikhan (2011) quoted Kwame Nkrumah, the leader of Ghana, saying inappropriate capital is used by the western powers for exploitation rather than developing the less fortunate countries. In other words, the increase of impertinent rangements in less developed countries unfortunately does not reduce the gap between the rich and the poor countries.Therefore, yes, income inequality is a very serious librate that should be taken into account because it is directly related to the welfare of society in a country. While it might be ar gued that inequality creates a dictatorial result in footing of a healthy rival and as motivation to lead a better spirit, the truth remains that income inequality is nothing but a burden towards society.3.0 Effects of Income diversityAs mentioned earlier, income inequality is a growing concern not only within a country but is a serious global issue. In this section, the effects of growing income inequality on a countrys economy and social development will be discussed.3.1 EconomyThrough the forms, economists and form _or_ system of politics makers have argued on the possible effect of income inequality on economics. According to Kuznets theory, the relationship of economic growth on income inequality can be illustrated by an inverted-U graph. When a country develops economically, the income inequality of that country worsens. A few decades later as a country grows wealthier with the rich investing more in the economy, the level of inequality reduces. However, the Kuznets t heory seems to only apply on developed countries because studies on the third world countries have shown contrasting results (Samanta and Heyes, 2006).Human capital is a great asset to a countrys development because sexual and skilled labours are the drivers of economy. In most poor countries, their economic growth is stunted by the high percentage of unemployed and unskilled labours due to the lack of education. Yet, in actuality, among those who are unfortunate to receive appropriate education, in that location are a great number of them who have potential to lead a better life. Regrettably, they do not have the opportunity to affiance education in golf club to contribute to the development of economy. As a result, the poor are not capable of providing goods and services to the economy that would bring forth high returns.Other than that, the fierce fortune of poverty also affects the economy. This vicious circle is a self-perpetuating process which returns to its initial p oint with no development from when it begun (Gary, 2010). The vicious circle of poverty is when a person earns low salary, they do not have enough money for savings, and thus, they are restricted to invest which so results in low productivity. Once again, low productivity causes low income, and the cycle repeats itself again continuously. In addition, when income is low, consumption decreases as well. receivable to this, the disposal are spending a large amount of money to negociate the problem instead of investing on the countrys development, thus causing the pass in economic growth. If the cycle persists in long-term, the economy of the country would breast greater risk.In a country suffering from high income inequality, in that respect is a possibility that political instability will occur and would then lead to social unrest that could affect the countrys economy. An example is the current issue in Egypt where the citizens were dissatisfied with the high levels of corrup tion, low wages, and poor living conditions. As a result, they protested against their President and brass, and it caused serious social unrest. This political instability could disapprove domestic and foreign investments hence, underdeveloped economy.3.2 SocialThe inequality affects peoples quality of life greatly when there is a gap between those with high and low income. However, the wealthier people of a country are not alter by the problem at all instead they are enjoying their wealth in ways we cant even imagine. Take mainland China as an example there are thousands of people with low living exemplars in mainland China working in factories with low wages, but people in cities like Shanghai on the other hand are living their lives luxuriously. This situation shows that the income inequality of China is relatively high with a Gini coefficient of 0.42 in year 2007, as stated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). In other words, income inequality affects a countrys social development negatively in terms of living standards, health, education and umbrage rates.Living standards is a measure of material welfare of a population in a sealed geographic area. For people with low income, they face difficulties as the living standard would be relatively high for them in order to support their periodic necessities as well as their families. Hunger and malnutrition is a very common problem among those unemployed as money is a limited factor. base on the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2010 report, most of the worlds empty are from developing countries which consist of 16% of the population.The second impact of income inequality is on the societys health. When there is inequality, it is clear that the less fortunate are affected greatly as they lack access to safe drinking water, undefended to unhygienic environment, and receives inadequate medical services. Some of the common diseases that affect the poor in third world count ries are malaria, tuberculosis, kwashiorkor, pneumonia, and AIDS. The unavailability of clinics and medication supplies in certain geographic areas worsens this condition. Not only that, but ignorance in behave control and contraption increases the rate of those suffering from HIV/AIDS. Due to this reasons, the fatality rate rate in those areas will keep increasing terrifyingly unless safety measures are taken into action.Thirdly, the social effect of income inequality is on education. With limited money to invest, most people with low income do not have the incident to enrol their children into school to obtain strait-laced education. Even if they do have the opportunity, they couldnt afford to continue to the tertiary level without any monetary support. Due to that, most of the poor are trapped in the vicious circle as mentioned earlier. For example, if a man is a low income worker, his son who lacks proper education would have to take up low income works as well and the cycle of unskilled workers in the mans family will run with the next generation continuously if there is no government intervention.The concluding social effect on a countrys development is the increase of crime rates. When money is scarce and an individual is desperate for survival, one would do abruptly anything in order to continue living. Theft and robbery is a major(ip) problem in most countries as crime is the only way for them to obtain material goods instead of using proper methods. This is because the income inequality that affects the poor has forced a high level of stress upon them, which leads them to committing crimes.Therefore, it is apparent that the crisis of income inequality affects negatively in a countrys development either in terms of economic growth or social welfare.4.0 Ways to Combat Income InequalityCountries worldwide have already taken action to reduce the wide gap between the rich and the poor by adopting new policies. The government of a country plays an i mportant role in order to overcome the problem of income inequality. The first method to combat inequality is the government should mete out their budget system relevantly. The governments main source of income comes from the tax paid by the people of a country as well as foreign investments into the country. Apart from investing on the countrys economy development and welfare expenses, the government should allocate and contribute money to the less fortunate too. One way of contribution is through unemployment benefits which were imposed in some countries such as Australia, Ireland, United Kingdom and Japan. Unemployment benefits are payments to the unemployed by the government or an authorised body of a country. Although the pay is not much, it is sufficient for them to actualize their basic necessities. With the aid of this benefit, the rate of unemployment and poverty decreases, thus, reduces the gap of inequality.My second pass is to provide training to unskilled labours tha t has great potential to work in high income jobs. By providing proper education and skills to the poor community, chances of them to break free from the poverty trap are higher. As mentioned earlier, there are very quite a number of people with potential who are not given the opportunity to display their true potential because they lack education. Therefore, by establishing a program where potential people from the poor community are given training to work in sectors other than agriculture and industrial, will allow them to live their lives a little wealthier than before.The next step to overcoming income inequality is by providing education to the less fortunate with the governments support. Such as mental synthesis schools in less developed areas, allocate accredited teachers to these areas to educate them, and providing scholarships so that they can move on to tertiary level education. It seems that obtaining a advised education is the only way to demolish the inequality betw een them and the wealthy. With proper education, it is not impossible for the poor to join the workforce alongside those people whose parents are wealthy enough to support them to study. In other words, education is able to reduce income inequality because they will then be earning the same salary and also automatically improves their living standards.The last possible surface in combating income inequality is through standardising minimum wage per hour for unskilled workers. By standardising minimum wage, living standards of the poor can be cured and also stimulate consumptions. However, there are arguments indicating this policy would be a disadvantage to a country because foreign investors would opt to invest in other countries which do not apply such policy. Though there is truth behind these words, if countries worldwide practice this policy together, it would provide positive outcomes to the less fortunate.5.0 ConclusionThroughout this report, I have discussed that the risin g of income inequality is indeed a serious matter in which its impact can be seen to affect both economy and social development of countries globally. The disparity of income between the rich and poor ought to be reduced in order to achieve an equal and better living standard among society. Although I am aware that income inequality cannot be solved overnight, I believe that locomote should be taken to overcome the problem. Therefore, in conclusion, special policies and global efforts are required to combat income inequality in order to accelerate economic and social development.